You’ll not find them on any list of “The most desirable places to live”. You’ve probably only even heard of one of them. You’d likely be wrong in guessing why two of the three came to their obscure place in history.
Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum. Three cities.
Not exactly vacation hotspots. But Jesus had harsh words for them. These are the cities that He pronounced “Woes” upon. These places heard a prognosis from the Son of God that would have frightened any real estate investor.
Tyre and Sidon, perennial bad boys of the “Old Testament Urban League” have greater reason for optimism on the coming day of Judgment than Chorazin and Bethsaida. The former were the focus of numerous prophetic warnings because of the godlessness of their cultures. But they are still around today. People live there. The latter? Chorazin is a place of ruins and Bethsaida is not even on the map – can’t find it.
Sodom, the incumbent number one of the annual “Worst Places Ever” list, has greater reason for optimism on the coming day of Judgment than Capernaum. The former was sister city to Gomorrah, home to the worst ethics violations in the early Old Testament. Things were so bad that God himself visited to check out the reports. It is no more. God rained burning sulfur on the city and destroyed every living person save Lot and his daughters. The latter is no more either- a place of ruins and irrelevance. No fire and brimstone, but also no legacy.
What did they do? What were these three cities guilty of that catapulted them to the poll position of bad news on Judgment Day?
Simply this: they did not repent, despite the fact that most of Jesus miracles were performed there.
Did you catch that? Do you understand what that means? Let me break it down for you in case you didn’t.
First, most of Jesus miracles occurred in cities that we essentially have no record of in the New Testament. That means that the miracles we do have record of represent the minority. This aligns with John’s statement regarding “the many other things that Jesus did” which are not recorded in the Bible.
Second, this suggests that the New Testament is more of a record of man’s response to God’s activity than it is a simple record of God’s activity. The Holy Spirit could have focused biblical writers on wonders and miracles that residents of these towns witnessed but did not respond to. But that would have benefitted us nothing. Instead, we are told of a lonely woman by a well, a blind man wanting to see, and rich man climbing into a tree – all people like us, trying to find our way, needing God to show up and help us a bit.
Third, a demonstration of God’s power doesn’t mean people will respond. He did a lot in these three cities, but people were generally unimpressed – you know, “people to see, places to go, things to do…” In the story of The Rich Man and Lazarus, the Rich Man, when he found himself in Hell, asked for someone to go back and tell his brothers about the reality of Hell, to warn them. Abraham’s response? “If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”
Translated – if you’re not listening you won’t hear; if you’re not looking you won’t see. That’s what these three cities did. They were shown wonders and didn’t see them. They were told amazing truths and didn’t hear anything.
Hershel Hobbs wrote…
“…citizens of these cities who rejected Christ will receive a greater judgment than will the citizens of Old Testament cities who never knew Him. Why will this be so? Because they sinned against the greater privilege. They were indifferent to their opportunity. It is a great privilege to be confronted with Christ. But it is also a great responsibility.”
So which is worse – committing a heinous sin or rejecting the great sacrifice of heaven for the heinous sin committed?
These three cities learned too late that it’s likely the latter.
Have you? Are you seeing today? Are you listening today? Or are you just too busy to be bothered with privilege?